Cultivating patient-centered care competence through a telemedicine-based course: An explorative study of undergraduate medical students' self-reflective writing.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has encouraged adaptations of learning methods in clinical clerkship. There have been limited reports on the merits of involving medical students in telemedicine. This study, therefore, aims to investigate students' reflection on what they learned and identify the challenges and benefits of doctor-patient interaction through their experience in a telemedicine-based course. Methods: A 4 week telemedicine-based course for medical students to participate in telemonitoring of COVID-19 patients undergoing self-isolation was conducted. This is a qualitative study using an interpretive phenomenology design to investigate students' self-reflection on their experiences in monitoring COVID-19 patients. Students were asked to reflect on their experience upon completion of the course through 750-1,000 words essays. A thematic analysis which considers units of meaning based on students' experiences was completed. Results: Our study identified four main themes gathered from students' experiences related to the telemedicine-based course: communication and education, professionalism and professional identity formation, system-based practice, and patient-centered care. Conclusion: The course was part of an integrative effort involving multiple parties to tackle the burden on the nation's healthcare system during the pandemic. Telemedicine is part of future medical practice which supports the medical curriculum adaptability along with attempts to develop future-proof medical doctors through various clinical learning experiences.

Learning Model to Achieve Clinical Reasoning Competency Using Technology-Enhanced Learning in Neurology Clinical Rotation: An Exploratory Study

The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated major adaptations in learning activities related to developing clinical reasoning competencies in neurology clerkship. The application of technology in this context is promising, but there are also several limitations. This study explores a learning model for achieving clinical reasoning competency using technology-enhanced learning in neurology clinical rotation. The study used a case-study design and was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine of YARSI University and its two teaching hospitals. Data were collected by document analysis, three focus group discussions with eight medical students and 20 postgraduate medical students, and five in-depth interviews with five neurologists. All the transcribed data were analysed with thematic analysis using the Steps for Coding and Theorization (SCAT) approach. Two themes were revealed--contributing factors and learning strategies--and six factors were found to influence the learning model: the quantity and quality of teacher interactions, students' motivation and skills in learning and technology, the variety and number of patients in teaching hospitals, the quality and quantity of facilities and infrastructure for service and education at the teaching hospitals, the clinical rotation programme design, and learning adaptation during the pandemic. The following technology-enhanced learning strategies for developing clinical reasoning skills were identified: blended learning, online logbook, telemedicine, collaborative online learning between teaching hospitals, and learning videos. This learning model can be implemented in a limited resource setting. Importantly, the identified factors from the perspective of students, clinical teachers, and school of medicine/teaching hospital, as well as technical factors, should be considered for the implementation of this model. [ FROM AUTHOR]

Self-Regulated Online Learning Profiles of Medical Students amidst Curriculum Adaptation during COVID-19 Pandemic

Student-centered learning (SCL) is an approach in which the learning process depends significantly on the student. Hence, self-regulated learning (SRL) plays a crucial role in optimising SCL. SRL is defined as active participation in terms of metacognition, motivation, and behaviour during learning. The COVID-19 pandemic greatly impacted education, including medical education, which must adapt by implementing online and blended learning curricula. Thus, there is increasing urgency for both SCL and SRL. This cross-sectional study was performed with medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, using the Online Self-regulated Learning Questionnaire (OSLQ) to determine the validity and reliability of the OSLQ in the setting of Indonesian medical students and measure their online SRL profiles. We conducted cross-cultural validation, followed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA), quantitative analysis, and qualitative analysis to assess students' SRL and the challenges of online learning environments. A total of 519 participants completed the questionnaire. The EFA confirmed the validity of the questionnaire, which comprised 23 items and five subscales, in the current population (Cronbach alpha = 0.86). Online SRL scores ranged between 65%--77%, with statistically significant differences in all subscales across six different academic years. Preclinical students had a higher level of online SRL compared to clinical students. This study supports the validity and reliability of using OSLQ in the context of Indonesian medical students. Student SRL is a dynamic process that evolves with changing learning contexts. Student support in online learning environments is essential for enhancing student SRL. [ FROM AUTHOR]

A COVID-19 self-isolation monitoring module for FMUI undergraduate medical students: Linking learning and service needs during the pandemic surge in Indonesia.

To ensure that students continued receiving adequate yet safe clinical exposure during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Faculty of Medicine at Universitas Indonesia (FMUI) created the Module of COVID-19 Self-Isolation Monitoring which aims to equip students with the knowledge and skill to monitor confirmed and close contact cases of COVID-19. Module development, divided into four phases: preparation, orientation, implementation, and evaluation phase, started as soon as the delta wave of COVID-19 cases forced medical students to halt their offline clinical rotations. A quantitative secondary data were obtained from student and patient satisfaction questionnaires and on students' performance and reflection. We analyzed the distribution of module evaluation, the student's discussion score during the module, the students' interest in participating as Covid-19 volunteers before and after the module's deployment, and the correlation between learning outcomes and satisfaction. A total of 372 patients were monitored by 208 students during the 4-week module. The response rates were above 80%, with the majority agreeing that students found this module well-organized and fulfilled their expectations. There was a significant increase in discussion scores from weeks 1 to 4, a significant difference in the proportion of students interested in COVID-19 volunteering before and after the module completion as well as a significant low correlation between the patient's monitoring score sheet and the reflection essay towards the patient's satisfaction. We should still improve tutors' time management, tutors' provision of triggering questions for critical thinking skills, and tutors' feedback for students. The module met patient expectations and is expected to assist tutors in providing feedback and examples of doctor-patient communication, thus accelerating students' competence in patient interaction. Further evaluation is needed regarding knowledge transfer, the impact on community health, and the faculty development program, especially regarding how tutors fulfill their roles as medical educators.

Knowledge, attitude, and practice related to the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate medical students in Indonesia: A nationwide cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: The potential role of medical students in raising awareness during public health emergencies has been acknowledged. To further explore their potentials as public educators and role models for the communities during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, this study aims to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of these students toward COVID-19. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among undergraduate medical students in Indonesia. Socio-demographics characteristics, social interaction history, information-seeking behavior, as well as knowledge, attitude, and practice toward COVID-19 were collected through a self-reported questionnaire. A p-value of <0.05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: Out of 4870 respondents, 64.9% had positive attitude and 51.5% had positive practice toward COVID-19, while only 29.8% had adequate knowledge. Knowledge was slightly positively correlated with attitude and practice (ρ = 0.074 and ρ = 0.054, respectively; both p<0.001), while attitude was weakly correlated with practice (ρ = 0.234, p<0.001). Several factors including age, sex, place of residence, institution type, academic level, family income, history of chronic illness, prior volunteering experience, and perceptual awareness on COVID-19 were significantly associated with either knowledge, attitude, and/or practice toward COVID-19. Furthermore, health institution's and the government's press releases, as well as health expert opinions were deemed as the most reliable sources of COVID-19-related information-yet trivially none of these sources were associated with knowledge, attitude, and practice in the study population. CONCLUSION: Many undergraduate medical students in Indonesia had positive attitude and practice against COVID-19, yet only a few had adequate knowledge. This warrants further interventions to keep them updated with COVID-19 evidence to maximize their potentials in raising public awareness on COVID-19.

Measuring online self-regulated learning among early-career medical doctors in a Massive Open Online Course on COVID-19

Introduction: As significant autonomy is given in a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC), online self-regulated learning (SRL) ability is crucial in such courses. We aim to measure the online SRL abilities of early-career medical doctors enrolled in a MOOC. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study using the Self-Regulated Online Learning Questionnaire-revised version (SOLQr). We conducted a three-stage cross-cultural validation of the SOL-Qr, followed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The online SRL ability of 5,432 medical doctors enrolled in a MOOC was measured using the validated SOL-Qr. Results: The CFA of the cross-translated SOL-Qr confirmed its comparability to the original version, with excellent validity & reliability. Participants showed high levels of online SRL during their early careers. Despite high online SRL scores, MOOC completion rate was low. Male participants showed slightly better time management ability than female participants. Participants working in the primary epicentrum for COVID-19 in the country showed lower online SRL scores, while participants who graduated from higher accreditation levels showed better time management ability. Conclusion: The SOL-Qr and its subscales are suitable and valid for measuring the online SRL abilities of medical doctors in a MOOC during their early-career period. Time management ability was associated with previous experience during the medical education period, while other online SRL subscales were mostly associated with workload. However, as the scores did not correlate with the time spent for learning in MOOC, the corresponding learning effort or time spent may be beyond just the commitment to the described MOOC. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Asia Pacific Scholar is the property of Centre for Medical Education (CenMed) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Supporting newly graduated medical doctors in managing COVID-19: An evaluation of a Massive Open Online Course in a limited-resource setting.

INTRODUCTION: Newly graduated medical doctors in their internships are positioned to strengthen the front line in combating COVID-19. We developed a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) to equip them with adequate knowledge for COVID-19 management. This paper aims to analyze the MOOC and evaluate participant satisfaction and increase in knowledge after completing the course. METHODS: An observational study was conducted. Quantitative data were obtained from questionnaires and pre- and post-tests. Responses to open-ended questions of the questionnaires were collected. Analysis using the Quality Reference Framework was also completed. RESULTS: The MOOC consisted of fundamental knowledge of COVID-19 (Part A) and further enrichment (Part B), and the content was written in the Indonesian language. A total of 3,424 and 2,462 participants completed the course in August and November 2020, respectively. Most participants agreed that the platform was easy to navigate, the design was interesting, and the content was aligned with their needs. Pre- and post-test scores in Part A's subjects increased significantly. Factors contributing to and inhibiting usability and areas for improvement were further highlighted. DISCUSSION: The use of a specific quality framework facilitated a comprehensive evaluation of the MOOC's strengths, weaknesses, and areas for future improvements. The participants' satisfaction and pre- and post-test results showed that the current MOOC holds great potential benefit for continuing education for medical interns joining the frontliners during the pandemic. Future implementation should consider increasing the quality of learning resources, scaling up the platform and its technical supports, and enhancing organizational supports.

Never waste a good crisis: Resilient health professions education

An editorial is presented which discusses Never waste a good crisis: Resilient health professions education, which includes a time where the Covid-19 pandemic is still very active around the world it is also callous to think of a crisis as an opportunity. We want to acknowledge this and we want to send our deepest sympathy to all those who have been personally affected by this pandemic.

Willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice of undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey in Indonesia.

BACKGROUND: The question to involve or restrict medical students' involvement in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic response remains contentious. As their state of preparation and perceptions in volunteering during this pandemic have yet to be investigated, this study aims to evaluate Indonesian medical students' willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A web-based survey was conducted among undergraduate medical students throughout Indonesia. Socio-demographic and social interaction information, in addition to willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice, were obtained using a self-reported questionnaire. The significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: Among 4870 participants, 2374 (48.7%) expressed their willingness to volunteer, while only 906 (18.6%) had adequate readiness to practice. Male students, students with prior volunteering experience in health or non-health sectors, and students from public universities or living in Central Indonesia (vs Java) had higher scores of willingness and readiness to volunteer. Students from Sumatra also had better preparedness (odds ratio [OR] 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-2.12, p = 0.004), while the opposite occurred for students from Eastern Indonesia (OR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.89, p = 0.002)-when compared to students from Java. In addition, compared to students with high family income, students from lower-middle income families were less willing to volunteer (OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.98, p = 0.034), though those with low family income had better readiness (OR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.10-2.08, p = 0.011). Shortage of medical personnel, sense of duty, and solicitation by stakeholders were the main reasons increasing the students' willingness to volunteer; whereas contrarily fear for own's health, absence of a cure, and fear of harming patients were the primary factors diminishing their willingness to volunteer. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that many Indonesian medical students are willing to volunteer, yet only few of them were ready to practice, indicating that further preparations are required to maximize their potentials and minimize their exposure to hazards. We suggest that their potentials as a firm support system during the pandemic should not be overlooked, and that the integration of relevant courses to the medical curricula are imperative to prepare for future public health emergencies.

Exploring medical students' professional identity formation through written reflections during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic have forced medical schools around the world to adapt. Major changes in curriculum delivery during the pandemic have impacted medical students' professional development. We assess undergraduate medical students' adaptations and Professional Identity Formation (PIF) by exploring their written reflections. Methods: This phenomenology study analyzes undergraduate medical students' written reflections. We perform a thematic analysis to identify emerging themes. Results: We purposively selected 80 written reflections, considering the students' year of study, gender, GPA, and education stage (preclinical or clinical). Three themes emerged: students' adaptation processes and coping strategies in facing the pandemic; their adaptation processes for learning; and their perceived roles as medical students during the pandemic. Conclusions: Adaptive coping mechanisms were implemented by the medical students in this study. The socialization processes that promote professional identity formation may change due to the tremendous disruption wrought by the pandemic; this has prompted our investigation of students' roles and various ways of interacting with role models. We highlight the importance of the medical school supporting students' adaptations and professional identity formation during this pandemic.

COVID-19 in Indonesia: Challenges and Multidisciplinary Perspectives for a Safe and Productive New Normal.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused disruption in all aspects of life, and countries around the world have been combating this pandemic using multiple approaches. Success in one country does not guarantee a transferable approach to other countries with different contexts. This review describes the challenges of COVID-19 management in Indonesia as a populous, socially and culturally diverse, and archipelagic country. It aims to provide multidisciplinary perspectives for a safe, evidence-based, and productive new normal as well as a comprehensive and integrated actionable policy for COVID-19 control.

Adaptation of internet-based multiple mini-interviews in a limited-resource medical school during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has affected many aspects of life, including medical education. The selection of students using multiple mini-interviews (MMI) should be adapted promptly as internet-based MMI (iMMI) in the current setting. The current transition from MMI to iMMI is supported by experience in conducting conventional MMI in previous years; hence, the station and assessor preparation could be completed without significant issues. The greater challenges to the use of iMMI are due to technical issues, including poor internet connections and adaptations necessary for assessing candidates' nonverbal expressions. This paper aims to describe the experience of conducting iMMI in the current pandemic situation, with further highlights on contextual challenges in a limited-resource setting.